The shoe?

Feb. 25th, 2011 01:36 pm
ciroccoj: (amused)
[personal profile] ciroccoj
Privacy includes being left alone and permitted to exercise one's own will over an object which is owned that's why it's called private property as opposed to public property. If the police steal someone's shoe that is theft because there are private property rights associated in it, and one has a reasonable expectation of privacy in the shoe.


There's nothing really wrong with the above, other than a run-on-sentence at first, but for some reason it brings to mind a bright twelve-year-old writing for a grade eight Civics class. Not a lawyer writing a Constitutional factum that is then posted onto a website to help other lawyers write Constitutional factums.

Not to mention, "one has a reasonable expectation of privacy in the shoe" makes me snicker. As does "The Crown argues that there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in the shoe."


And also? "Twaddle" is a really, really unfortunately name for a judge.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

November 2012

S M T W T F S
    123
45 678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 6th, 2026 06:58 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios