Ohgod I love my flist.
Apr. 29th, 2007 12:29 amAfter my forlorn plea from yesterday, I received lots and lots of help and lovely links and sites and what do you know, I'm almost all done Australia (thank you so much,
sangerin!) and am well on my way to being done the US (I love you
klostes,
bandgeek and
sidravitale!) Just need to tighten stuff up, work on the overall flow, and fill in the spaces that currently say things like "Subsequently, the Supreme Court ruled in Atkinson Trading Co., Inc. v. Shirley et al. that [fill it in once I understand what the hell they're talking about], stating among other things that Montana's exceptions are not triggered in this case [WTF does Montana say?]." Because I don't think my prof will be impressed by that kind of language.
Hm. Hang on...
"Subsequently, the Supreme Court ruled in Atkinson Trading Co., Inc. v. Shirley et al. that bad things happened to tribal sovereignty, stating among other things that Montana's exceptions, which I do not understand, are not triggered in this case."
There! Done! Wow, that was easy.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Hm. Hang on...
"Subsequently, the Supreme Court ruled in Atkinson Trading Co., Inc. v. Shirley et al. that bad things happened to tribal sovereignty, stating among other things that Montana's exceptions, which I do not understand, are not triggered in this case."
There! Done! Wow, that was easy.