ciroccoj: (prettiest)
[personal profile] ciroccoj
I like this one. I'm taking it from [livejournal.com profile] linaelyn, who took it from [livejournal.com profile] jelazakazone who got it from [livejournal.com profile] celandineb who received it from [livejournal.com profile] juniperus, who borrowed it from [livejournal.com profile] a_d_medievalist, who nicked it from [livejournal.com profile] pisica: as was demonstrated in an interview with Katie Couric, Sarah Palin was unable to name1 (while under pressure during an interview) any Supreme Court Case other than Roe v. Wade.

The Rules: post information about ONE Supreme Court decision, modern or historic, to your lj. (Any decision, as long as it's not Roe v. Wade.) For those who see this on your f-list, take the meme to your OWN lj to spread the fun.

------------------------------------
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954)
This decision overturned earlier rulings going back to Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896, which had declared that legally mandated separation of the races did not violate the Constitution. The catchphrase "separate but equal" was used to justify racial segregation in all walks of public life, from transportation to education.

The court in Brown declared unanimously that state laws that mandated separate public schools for black and white students denied black children equal educational opportunities. The decision stated that "separate educational facilities are inherently unequal." Racial segregation was declared to be in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment.
------------------------------------


1 I believe Palin was actually unable to name Supreme Court decisions that she felt were wrongly decided - other than Roe v. Wade. (Someone correct me if I'm wrong on that one.) I suppose if the meme were to ask to post a decision I felt was wrongly decided, it would be Plessy v. Ferguson :)


As an aside, I wonder if any of our current candidates could rattle off famous Canadian Supreme Court decisions. I wonder how many Canadians could. I may be posting a few in the next few days :)

Date: 2008-10-02 05:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sangerin.livejournal.com
I'm not Canadian, but I was thinking of posting R v Lavallee as my "Supreme Court decision" - hey, they never said the US Supreme Court!

Not that I think Lavallee was necessarily wrongly decided.

Date: 2008-10-04 03:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ciroccoj.livejournal.com
I'm not Canadian, but I was thinking of posting R v Lavallee as my "Supreme Court decision" - hey, they never said the US Supreme Court!
Oooh, that's a good one! I'd forgotten about that one. I was thinking of our abortion, assisted suicide, and euthanasia cases. And a couple civil rights ones, and the same-sex marriage one, though that one didn't go to our Supremes.

You know we studied about five or six major Australian cases in Property? For some reason, it seemed a lot of Canadian property-related jurisprudence was Australian. ?

Date: 2008-10-02 07:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] linaelyn.livejournal.com
I love that of those who've gacked this meme from me, fully 40% have been non-USAians. You get extra-big bonus points for this, though: I believe Palin was actually unable to name Supreme Court decisions that she felt were wrongly decided - other than Roe v. Wade. (Someone correct me if I'm wrong on that one.) I suppose if the meme were to ask to post a decision I felt was wrongly decided, it would be Plessy v. Ferguson :)

I was unaware of that.

Date: 2008-10-04 03:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ciroccoj.livejournal.com
I love that of those who've gacked this meme from me, fully 40% have been non-USAians.
I noticed that! Friendsfriends was very neat to watch this week - and especially cool to see what different people remembered and thought important, and why :) :)

Date: 2008-10-02 11:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] daf9.livejournal.com
I could name not a one - US or Canadian. Sad, isn't it?

Date: 2008-10-04 03:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ciroccoj.livejournal.com
LOL - yeah, well you're not running for office though, right?

And I'm sure you know at least one: Miranda :)

Date: 2008-10-02 02:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shiningmoon.livejournal.com
You're right, she was asked to name another decision besides Roe v. Wade that she disagreed with; I don't think she could honestly come up with ANYTHING besides that one, anyway. She just babbled the answer and mentioned Roe v. Wade again.

Date: 2008-10-04 03:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ciroccoj.livejournal.com
You're right, she was asked to name another decision besides Roe v. Wade that she disagreed with; I don't think she could honestly come up with ANYTHING besides that one, anyway. She just babbled the answer and mentioned Roe v. Wade again.
::sigh:: She sure is pretty, though.

Date: 2008-10-03 03:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lisa3353.livejournal.com
Okay, I don't agree with Sarah Palin on anything, but I had to throw her a bone on this one. What a lousy question. It's something I would have expected from Fox News, not CBS. I don't think you could have gotten a broader question. Let's face it, we aren't a well informed society. It's not as though our media even reports decisions on a consistent basis.
Of course, if I had to choose a decision I disagree with, I'm going with Bush v. Gore. If that had gone the other way, maybe we wouldn't be in the mess we're in right now.

Date: 2008-10-04 03:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ciroccoj.livejournal.com
Okay, I don't agree with Sarah Palin on anything, but I had to throw her a bone on this one. What a lousy question. It's something I would have expected from Fox News, not CBS. I don't think you could have gotten a broader question. Let's face it, we aren't a well informed society. It's not as though our media even reports decisions on a consistent basis.
Well... yeah, but OTOH, she's running for VP. We're not a well-informed society, and it wouldn't surprise me if most Americans (or Canadians) couldn't name a single Supreme Court decision (whether they agreed or disagreed with it), but the potential head of the Executive branch should have some familiarity with the decisions of the head of the Judicial branch.

I do acknowledge that she was under pressure, and the question wasn't a no-brainer, but I wish she'd been able to name even one other case.

Of course, if I had to choose a decision I disagree with, I'm going with Bush v. Gore. If that had gone the other way, maybe we wouldn't be in the mess we're in right now.
::sigh:: Truer words...

November 2012

S M T W T F S
    123
45 678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 2nd, 2025 12:37 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios