ciroccoj: (Default)
[personal profile] ciroccoj
OK, from Sarah, this is too snarky to not link to it:

http://www.despair.com

I believe I will order a few of these posters. I especially loved
http://www.despair.com/limitations.html
http://www.despair.com/ambition.html
http://www.despair.com/success.html
http://www.despair.com/gettowork.html

And, speaking of demotivation:
  1. Property
    • Heffron v. Imperial Parking Co
    • Bird v. Town of Fort Frances
    • Attorney-General of Canada v. Brock
    • Introduction to Real Property
    • Adoption of English Real Property Law in Ontario
    • 221-231 Mossman text

  2. ADR
    • Interview: Theory
    • Communications: Theory

  3. call Legal Aid re. wills and who can perform marriages
  4. parking ticket
  5. finish belt and boots for Justin's costume
  6. make appointment with GyneGuy
  7. learn two choir songs
  8. write out interrupting thing for Chris

  • look at blazerrose's fic
  • bast's Serena stories


    Later Edit: [livejournal.com profile] bear, [livejournal.com profile] kaylarudbek, [livejournal.com profile] gypsum or anybody else who might know:

    I was under the impression that judges (especially Supremes) are not allowed to talk in public about decisions they have made or been part of. The rationale for this is that if they have anything to say, they have ample opportunity to do so in their published decisions. They can write anything they want, and their opinions have legal weight as binding precedent, or strong dissent that may some day be adopted as a common law rule, or even legally persuasive obiter dicta. Talking about it after the fact may give undue weight to their comments, because they're Exalted Judges, and people may take their off-the-cuff remarks very seriously even though they have absolutely no legal significance.

    Is this so, or is that only the case in Canada? And if it's true for the US... what's up with Justice Scalia?

    Scalia Ridicules Court's Gay Sex Ruling

    Hell, even if it's not true, what's up with Scalia? Who peed in his Wheaties?
  • Date: 2003-10-24 06:56 am (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] bear.livejournal.com
    Despair.com? Dude, that's *brilliant*.

    ::is vastly amused::

    November 2012

    S M T W T F S
        123
    45 678910
    11121314151617
    18192021222324
    252627282930 

    Most Popular Tags

    Style Credit

    Expand Cut Tags

    No cut tags
    Page generated Aug. 2nd, 2025 12:32 am
    Powered by Dreamwidth Studios