ciroccoj: (failure)
[personal profile] ciroccoj
London Olympic Logo Triggers Debate.

Apparently, the official logo for the London Olympics of 2012 has been unveiled. And folks are arguing vehemently over whether or not it can be considered "hideous".



Oy Vey.

Date: 2007-06-05 10:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] owens-mom.livejournal.com
As a graphic designer, I think I have to agree that yes, it is in fact rather hideous.

*squints and tilts head*

Date: 2007-06-05 10:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sangerin.livejournal.com
I'm still wondering why there is a fairly obvious stylised map of Australia in the top right hand corner. Also why the Olympic colours are nowhere to be seen.

Date: 2007-06-06 12:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ciroccoj.livejournal.com
::snicker:: Hadn't noticed the Australia thing, but OMG you're totally right!

And apparently the logo comes in various different colours. Colours designed to "reach out" to young people.

?

Date: 2007-06-05 10:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] owens-mom.livejournal.com
Holy crap, and there is an epilepsy warning on the animated one! LOL

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/olympics/2007-06-05-417557402_x.htm

Date: 2007-06-05 11:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 13-moons.livejournal.com
holy crap your icon is fecking hysterical!

Date: 2007-06-06 12:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ciroccoj.livejournal.com
ROFL!!!

Also, I echo the icon comment above :D :D

Date: 2007-06-05 10:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] officerjudy.livejournal.com
Yep, pretty hideous if I do say so myself.

Date: 2007-06-06 12:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ciroccoj.livejournal.com
Breathes new life into the term "fugly", IMHO.

Date: 2007-06-05 10:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lizzie-omalley.livejournal.com
There are people who think it's not hideous? Ponders the sanity of the world.

Date: 2007-06-06 12:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ciroccoj.livejournal.com
I know!! I thought it was a joke when I saw it, but apparently the Olympic committee paid good money for it.

!

Date: 2007-06-05 11:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 13-moons.livejournal.com
'nother vote for hideous...I can't even imagine a vehement argument for it being not hideous...

Date: 2007-06-06 01:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ciroccoj.livejournal.com
Yeah, no kidding! Who actually thought this was a good idea?

Wow.

Date: 2007-06-06 12:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shiningmoon.livejournal.com
What on earth is it supposed to BE?!?!?! I mean, if you try really, REALLY hard, you might be able to see the city of London broken up into bits as if on a map, but... gad. The design team should be taken out at dawn and tarred and feathered.

Re: Wow.

Date: 2007-06-06 01:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ciroccoj.livejournal.com
No, it's supposed to be the numbers 2, 0, 1 and 2. There is no London & no UK in the logo. And it's supposed to appeal to a "younger" audience. And it cost $796,000.

I can only assume that the money went to a large purchase of crack, which was first ingested by the designer and then shared among the committee who approved the design.

Re: Wow.

Date: 2007-06-06 02:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shiningmoon.livejournal.com
*squints* Ok, now that you've pointed that out, I can see it.

It must have been some very good crack.

Re: Wow.

Date: 2007-06-06 05:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] owens-mom.livejournal.com
What, like toddlers? and I need to find these high paying graphics jobs...sheesh!

Date: 2007-06-06 06:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] azeraeis.livejournal.com
I think it's just a matter of poor timing. This was meant to be the logo for the 2012 B.C. Olympic games when the Flinstoneqsue look would have been really quite appropriate as would be the Hanna Barberra Orangeā„¢ used to color the hideous thing.

Date: 2007-06-07 01:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ciroccoj.livejournal.com
This was meant to be the logo for the 2012 B.C. Olympic games
LOL!! Yeah, maybe :D :D

You know you read too much slash when...

Date: 2007-06-06 12:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mama-rana.livejournal.com
That icon somehow looks like 2 guys going at it *bag*

My second thought was that it was supposed to be some sort of Asian writing, until I paid more attention to the fact that it was for the London games. *headdesk*

So, yeah, really bad.

Re: You know you read too much slash when...

Date: 2007-06-06 05:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] owens-mom.livejournal.com
That icon somehow looks like 2 guys going at it *bag*

OMG you are right!!!!! rotflmao!!!!

Re: You know you read too much slash when...

Date: 2007-06-07 01:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ciroccoj.livejournal.com
That icon somehow looks like 2 guys going at it *bag*
::snicker:: You know, it's possible I need to read more slash, because that didn't occur to me at all... and it totally should have :D :D :D

Date: 2007-06-06 11:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] snarkhunter.livejournal.com
Um.

When I look at that, I see one of two things. First: A person with an abnormally large head attempting to give another person a blow job. Second: A person viciously shoving another person (who has an abnormally large head and/or has his/her head unfortunately stuck in a crate) right in the mouth.

Neither one says "celebration of athletic prowess and world harmony!"

Well. Maybe the first one.

Date: 2007-06-07 02:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ciroccoj.livejournal.com
When I look at that, I see one of two things. First: A person with an abnormally large head attempting to give another person a blow job.
ROFLMAO!

Chris actually came up the stairs just now to ask me what the hell I was cackling about :D :D :D

Neither one says "celebration of athletic prowess and world harmony!"

Well. Maybe the first one.

::dies::

November 2012

S M T W T F S
    123
45 678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 7th, 2025 04:33 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios